Why is sudan a failed state

S Catholic Bishops are pressing for more robust diplomatic and development-centered engagement that emphasizes reducing poverty, strengthening civil society actors, and mitigating climate change.

Unfortunately, the rise of nationalist populism renders nations less amenable or able to develop and coordinate such approaches. But just because current international mechanisms are inadequate to address state failure does not mean that we should abandon the people of South Sudan. It does suggest a hard-eyed acceptance that no ideal solution to the current tragedy is on the horizon. Ameliorating the situation will take patience and sustained engagement, perhaps for years, doing what is possible and biding time for when windows open to new governing arrangements — to a new generation of leaders not compromised by corruption and atrocity.

Such international engagement must build upon the fragile peace accord of , which has brought some respite for aid and development.

Parts of the country have stabilized, allowing select local governments to function, NGO operations to resume, and some schools to reopen. The UN World Food Program has creatively negotiated with factional leaders to improve humanitarian access and food security.

Because deadlines for the formation of a unity government continue to be pushed out, [] international pressure on the antagonists must be maintained. A true unity government must reckon with, and check, Dinka domination of Salva Kiir. International actors, from the Troika to the African Union to IGAD and the UN, must continue to invest in stabilizing the country and providing security guarantees central to the peace accord like cantoning rival troops, bringing them in from the bush where they are more amenable to discipline.

Helping to expand areas of relative stability depends on such security guarantees. If there is a responsibility to protect, a sovereign obligation , it certainly belongs to the United States. Given its pivotal role in the birth of South Sudan, the U. But this responsibility also belongs to those of us in the West especially the United States who were involved in the advocacy campaign that led to independence. Subdued responses to the complexities of internecine conflict must be replaced by vigorous, if sober, activism to press advanced nations and international agencies to help the people of South Sudan rescue their fledgling nation.

While the AU officially embraced responsibility, it does not have clear mechanisms to act on it. Ambassador Susan Page noted this problem. Susan D. As to regional actors, Uganda at one point sent troops to help Salva Kiir stay in power.

Lake and Christopher J. Unfortunately, not only has the Trump administration accelerated American retrenchment, it has contributed to the unraveling of existing mechanisms of order. She and others engaged in intense personal communications with the two sides and remonstrating and chiding when negotiations threatened to break down.

Phone interview with Deborah Fikes, She found SPLM officials increasingly resistant to reasonable advice. Interview, May 24, Ambassador Susan Page described the situation.

South Sudan is a vivid example of how predatory violence wipes out development initiatives. Citation provided by R. The appeal was co-signed by Anglican Archbishop Weldon and Rev. John Chalmers, former moderator of the Church of Scotland. Interview with Susan Page. Casie Copeland commented on the logistical challenges of such a transitional authority in South Sudan.

In commenting on a draft of this paper, Ashworth noted that no second tier of leaders is prepared to take over right now. Casie Copeland, long-term champion for the people of South Sudan, now works for the UN World Food Program, whose director, David Beasley, has undertaken creative initiatives to deliver relief aid to remote areas of the country.

Opongo, and R. This study is based on dozens of interviews with South Sudanese religious and civil society leaders conducted in IT EN.

Publications Acta. Nation, State, Nation-State. Human Trafficking: Issues Beyond Criminalization. The Global Quest for Tranquillitas Ordinis. Pacem in Terris, Fifty Years Later. Universal Rights in a World of Diversity. Crisis in a Global Economy. Catholic Social Doctrine and Human Rights. Pursuing the Common Good. Charity and Justice in the Relations among Peoples and Nations.

Vanishing Youth? Conceptualization of the Person in Social Sciences. Intergenerational Solidarity, Welfare and Human Ecology. The Governance of Globalisation. Intergenerational Solidarity. Globalization, Ethical and Institutional Concerns. Democracy - Reality and Responsibility. Towards Reducing Unemployment. Democracy - Some Acute Questions. The Future of Labour and Labour in the Future.

Studia Selecta. Inclusive Solidarity and Integration of Marginalized People. On the Encyclical Fratelli Tutti. Extra Series. Trafficking with a Special Focus on Children. Summary on Globalization.

Globalization and International Justice. Presentation of the 'Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church'. Globalization and Education.

Statement on Globalization and Education. Closed Session on Globalization and Education. Closed Session on the Governance of Globalization. Closed Session on Intergenerational Solidarity. Democracy in Debate, Reports. The Meaning of the Priority of Labour.

In the air in a Hercules over a swamp-encircled village called Nhial, km north of Loki, my sense of slight unease was temporarily displaced by adrenaline. An airdrop this one was Canadian funded is an exhilarating experience. You strap in at the rear door. You feel the hot wind, the ground rushes past metres below, the aircraft screams into a climb and twelve tons of food roll by you. What could be more inspiring? But then I made my way back to the cockpit as we made a final pass to check for accuracy.

The pilot pointed down and off to one side. The engines were too loud for speech. I could see men in rebel uniform barging their way in, pushing the civilians to one side. The diversion of international aid was deeply problematic in the second Sudanese civil war. It allowed one side a distinct advantage and may well have contributed to its outcome. But blatant behaviour of the kind I saw at Nhial was only part of the story.

Wherever I went on the ground in rebel-held territory, there were well-intentioned internationals delivering western-funded health, sanitation and education projects. These programs were, I was happy to report to Ottawa, conscientiously administered and effective. The problem — more easily visible in hindsight — was that we were effectively running the place. The rebel SPLA were freed up simply to fight. There was no need for them to provide any services for their people.

Probably not. The rebels had little sense of responsibility; hundreds of thousands would have died, and within a few months CNN coverage of starving babies would have forced us back in. Peace finally came in , thanks largely to a deeply committed U. There was, however, a major flaw in the Comprehensive Peace Agreement that ended the fighting.

The party to which power was handed on a plate — the SPLA — was dominated by the Dinka ethnic group and was far from representative of the country-to-be. Oilfields would give the new country the highest GDP per capita in the region, we told each other. Then we most of us went home. The job seemed to be done. I would argue, as I have in the past , that Riek Machar is correct insofar as his analysis that Salva Kiir has to go.

Salva Kiir as President precipitated what was a political crisis by firing his vice president and other leaders. Then he exacerbated the situation, turning a rivalry between politicians into an armed conflict by attempting to claim, without any evidence, an alleged coup attempt to justify eliminating his opponents.

That type of criminal incompetence turned a political dispute into a civil war. That level of sheer idiocy alone disqualifies him going forward. There is no default position that says Salva Kiir needs to stay. I am going to argue that perhaps he needs to go. The important thing is to move forward with a process that will enable real political dialogue rather than simply cementing someone in place.

Pham: I am a little more optimistic of the negotiating process now than I was several months ago because the international community has finally come to the realization that the IGAD-led process was fatally flawed.

So one of the parties to the conflict, Salva Kiir as President of South Sudan, participated in meetings of the group that was supposed to be mediating the conflict. Needless to say that was a no starter and IGAD was unable to overcome that obstacle.

The reinvigorated process, which brings in the international community, the African Union, and other actors, potentially helps bridge that impasse.

Another party to the conflict, Uganda, which has sent troops to prop up Salva Kiir, was part of IGAD, as was Kenya, which had turned a blind eye to the comings and goings of people on both sides of the conflict.

But it can make a contribution to protecting civilians by at least putting leaders responsible for grave human rights violations on notice that there will be no impunity for their crimes.

There is a grim calculation, made by the government and rebel forces, that they can win and beat their opponents into submission or death. South Sudan marks the fourth anniversary of its independence on July 9.

It was framed as a Christian, democratic victory against a despotic, Muslim north. The South Sudanese voted overwhelmingly to decide their own destiny, a people who had been abused by their northern neighbour for decades, and yet only four years later the country is struggling to cope with an overwhelming humanitarian crisis.

The economy is in free-fall. The facts are stark. Nearly eight people out of a population of around 11 million are facing severe hunger. Malnutrition and deadly cholera are ravaging parts of the state. Children are abducted to fight.